Search for: "US v. Stone" Results 941 - 960 of 2,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
, Neil Wilkof recalls the relationship between the Rolling Stones and Chess Records, in whose studios the “2120 South Michigan Avenue” composition was recorded in 1964.No measure of success in passing off cup caseRosie Burbidge analyses George East Housewares Ltd v Fackelmann GmbH & Co KG & Probus Creative Housewares Ltd, [2016] EWHC 2476 (IPEC). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:56 am by Larry
I recently learned a lot more about pine nuts when I read Specialty Commodities Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  There will, of course, be the usual live streaming of the hearing (available in Canada but curiously not in the US). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
California State Law State battery law prohibits the willful and unlawful use of force or violence against anybody. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
California State Law State battery law prohibits the willful and unlawful use of force or violence against anybody. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The other time was in 2000; that election was resolved via the SCOTUS decison in Bush v Gore.All of this has us over here at the Law Blogger re-examining the indirect method by which we select our president through the electoral college.The electoral college is rooted in Article II of the United States Constitution, as fine-tuned by the Twelfth Amendment. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
This is an article in Lexology asking the question: The “offer to make amends” in defamation cases: No longer a useful tool for defendants? [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The judge opted to use the initials of the accused instead of his full name. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 9:17 am by David Oxenford
Under the NY Times v Sullivan Supreme Court precedent, the decision in defamation cases quite often depends on the determination of whether the person who was allegedly defamed is a public figure. [read post]