Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit" Results 941 - 960 of 6,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit immigration executive order, and he was kind enough to let me reprint it here: Yesterday a unanimous panel of the Ninth Circuit issued an order and a brief opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:02 am by Brian T. Pedigo, Esq.
The Costco case was an important decision for the wine industry in the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am by John Bellinger
"   The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to show whether “some of the activity underlying their ATS claim took place in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 09-17796 & 10-15026. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:59 pm
San Francisco, California - A lawyer for Prenda Law argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and was heard by Judges Harry Pregerson, Richard Tallman and Jacqueline Nguyen. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:21 pm
In United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land (Martinek) (No. 04-35131, Apr. 4, 2007), the Ninth Circuit addressed two interesting issues in the context of a federal taking of unpatented gold- mining claims in Alaska's Denali National Park. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:46 am by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
In a published decision, post on April 7, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the Board of Immigration Appeals Post-Departure Bar Rule, in 8 C.F.R. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
. ___ (2013), the United State Supreme Court held that the term “defalcation” in the Bankruptcy Code includes a culpable state of mind requirement involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness in respect to, the improper nature of the fiduciary behavior giving rise to liability. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
. ___ (2013), the United State Supreme Court held that the term “defalcation” in the Bankruptcy Code includes a culpable state of mind requirement involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness in respect to, the improper nature of the fiduciary behavior giving rise to liability. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
. ___ (2013), the United State Supreme Court held that the term “defalcation” in the Bankruptcy Code includes a culpable state of mind requirement involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness in respect to, the improper nature of the fiduciary behavior giving rise to liability. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
June 12,  2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee must notify creditors, set a hearing or opportunity for a hearing and obtain bankruptcy court approval as a condition of paying taxes incurred by the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
June 12,  2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee must notify creditors, set a hearing or opportunity for a hearing and obtain bankruptcy court approval as a condition of paying taxes incurred by the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
June 12,  2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee must notify creditors, set a hearing or opportunity for a hearing and obtain bankruptcy court approval as a condition of paying taxes incurred by the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:25 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Seemingly adopting a more contrite position as to the greater public, and perhaps recognizing that the mandamus approach may be regarded as more foolish than innovative, the Littler firm has issued the following statement: “We have great respect for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and are preparing a response to its order. [read post]