Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 941 - 960 of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
For example, Robert Wood Johnson IV—the ambassador to the United Kingdom—co-owns the New York Jets. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
Emanating from Guantánamo yesterday:News stories reporting rumors that the military commissions case of United States of America v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
” In the waning days of the Clinton presidency, EPA found such regulation “appropriate. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is thought to have played a role in Bill Clinton's decision, as he was leaving his presidency, to commute the sentences of four (non-Satmar) Chasids who had been convicted of bilking the United States out of millions of dollars. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court of Illyria, mirabile dictu, displays an uncanny resemblance to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jeanine Cali
… “It’s not such a terrible thing to go on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Jessica Zhang, Andrew Patterson
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]