Search for: "United States v. Francisco" Results 941 - 960 of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
The appellate judges came down on Idaho’s side when a section which criminalizes obtaining records of an agricultural production facility by misrepresentation—protected against a legally cognizable harm associated with a false statement survived constitutional scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Scott Bomboy
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:22 am by SHG
The United States seems all too happy to comply, even though the Iraqi claim is almost certainly false and, should Ameen be sent back to Iraq, he will almost certainly be executed. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:00 am by rainey Reitman
 And in courtrooms across the United States, EFF battled over issues of freedom and privacy. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
City and County of San Francisco, which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law will generally preclude any federal suit. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-1026Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco May 31, 2013, A135745) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:22 am by Margaret Wood
”  This proclamation references the 2013 case heard by the United States Supreme Court, Windsor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:33 am by Simon Lester
 The Rousso decision is consistent with the Washington court's decision in State v. [read post]