Search for: "United States v. Gay" Results 941 - 960 of 1,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:40 am by Stephen Page
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY BISHOP, ) SHARON BALDWIN, ) SUSAN BARTON, and ) GAY PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiffs, )) v. ) No. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
  As Wikipedia noteshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Text , the 4thAmendment establishes that “the people” of the United States are constitutionally protected against “unreasonable” searches and seizures. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:17 am by Lyle Denniston
  That trend began with the Supreme Court’s decision last Term (United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The motion was based on a defense contention that the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution foreclosed application of the recently enacted statute repealing the corroboration rules that would otherwise have governed the trial on those counts. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Timothy P. Flynn
A proactive clerk in Dona Ana County, New Mexico began issuing same-sex marriage licenses last August in the wake of the SCOTUS' same-sex marriage decision in United States v Windsor. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:31 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the post United States v Windsor marriage jurisprudence, couples are challenging state constitutional bans on gay marriage by metes and bounds. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:16 am by Eric Turkewitz
But if you ran for Vice President of the United States, or if you are an attorney volunteering to be the talking head legal analyst on a cable show, you ought to know that the issue of free speech applies to the government, not a private cable television channel. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm by By Shawn Jain, ACLU
Here in the United States, for example, the Supreme Court ruled in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]