Search for: "United States v. Hill" Results 941 - 960 of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Fix the Court reports that according to the Judicial Conference of the United States, “financial disclosure reports for federal judges, including Supreme Court justices,” will “be made available to the press and public via thumb drives at no charge. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a sentencing case to be argued in April; Berman worked with Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed to brief and argue the case as an amicus in support of the judgment below, on the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:23 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
The constitutionality of the SEC’s use of ALJs was recently called into question by an Atlanta federal court in Hill v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:14 am by Brian Cuban
Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren was invited to speak  to about 500 students at University of California at Irvine on Feb. 8. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
’” In an op-ed for The Hill, Richard Custin argues that the court should review Daniel v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
Salmonella is one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Secure Capital Funding Corporation, Bertram Augustus Hill, PP&M Trade Partners, and Kiavanni PringleCase number: 11-cv-00916 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: February 18, 2011Qualifying judgment/order: March 10, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-29 SEC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am by Dan Ernst
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]