Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
The case is Mayfair House Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:49 am
United States, 16 F.4th 242 (7th Cir., October 21, 2021) involved the erroneous sale of assets comprising part of the corpus of a grantor trust. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm
But in Cardno ChemRisk v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Swain v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
United States [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has proposed what he delightfully calls the No Kings Act, the putative purpose of which is to reverse the Supreme Court’s presidential criminal immunity ruling in Trump v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 3:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
C. 245; United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
” See Wells v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
King. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
Sixth graders were also beginning a unit on ancient Mesopotamia. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age… [read post]
