Search for: "United States v. Olds" Results 941 - 960 of 8,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The principle was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Machtinger v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 8:29 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Members of the J.O.P. class are those who, by February 24, 2025, (1) were determined to be an “unaccompanied alien child”; (2) filed an asylum application that was pending with USCIS; (3) on the date they filed their asylum application with USCIS, were 18 years old or older, or had a parent or legal guardian in the United States available to provide care and physical custody, and (4) whose asylum application USCIS has not adjudicated on the merits. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
§ 11222, render the statute unconstitutional pursuant to the United States and Maine Constitutions. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:26 am
Last week, the NJ Supreme Court held that an NJ DWI - DUI traffic stop was legal under the United States and the New Jersey Constitutions in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:58 am by Kent Scheidegger
Case 10-7012 in the United States Supreme Court (a defendant's certiorari petition) is titled Stephen M. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm by Keith L. Miller
A Magistrate Judge in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that an attorney defending a legal malpractice suit, is not limited to the discovery previously conducted in an underlying action. [read post]