Search for: "United States v. Smith"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2024, 12:26 pm
The new Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Finally, he requests that he be resentenced pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:37 am
” Unfortunately for those injured by modern-day governments, the doctrine of sovereign immunity is still alive and well in the United States, even though our country has not been under the ostensible power of a king for centuries. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:00 am
WebbBank of the United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
Wright, Penn State Law, Reconsidering CapacityClark Hobson, University of Leicester Law School, Assisted Suicide in the United Kingdom: Can a Human Rights Framework Deal with Freedom-Towards-Death? [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:49 am
The Drug & Device Law blog recently posted an analysis of an interesting case, United States ex rel. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:33 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:48 am
., LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:50 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:59 pm
Smith). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
United States, 559 U.S. 133 (2010)). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
United States, 471 U.S. 1063 (1985) (GVRing for further consideration in light of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
In Addington v Texas, the United States Supreme Court held that a civil commitment proceeding can in no sense be equated with a criminal proceeding. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Facts: This case (Quantum Fitness Corporation et al v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:03 am
Smith, Prosecution and Def. of Forfeiture Cases § 10.05[8] (2007) (noting that this issue may be dispositive when illegally seized res is currency); see also United States v. $557,933.89 in U.S. [read post]
