Search for: "United States v. State of Alabama"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 3:39 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:05 am
Alabama” in light of the Court’s recent ruling in Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:18 pm
Marion County, upholding a stringent state voter ID law, and Citizens United v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm
Senator Michael Bennett (D-Colo.) introduced a bill that would establish a federal watchdog to regulate “Big Tech”—the largest technology companies in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 10:20 am
United States, comes from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:36 am
Most recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found in Midlothian Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
” State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 6:20 pm
United Press Int'l, Inc. (7th Cir. 1981) (noting "that 'rape' as defined by common usage is incorporated into second-degree sexual assault under Wisconsin law"); Hovey v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:58 am
For example, for litigants bringing cases in United States Federal Districts Courts, the pleading standard requires that the complaint must set forth at least “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
When the HHS Secretary has declared a public health emergency and the President of the United States has declared a disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act or National Emergencies Act, the HHS Secretary is authorized to grant certain waivers or modifications in order to address the outbreak (referred to as a Section 1135 Waiver). [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Yesterday’s case is United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 3:57 pm
[Update 1040PM] I should note the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:23 am
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court decided a case entitled Orr v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:41 am
Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am
The rationale behind this bill should be obvious, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Alabama-Tombigbee Rivers v. [read post]
