Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner" Results 941 - 960 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am by Daniel Jin
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
From the UK Human Rights blog – three posts which caught my eye and worth a read: Adam Wagner -  Criticisms remain as dust settles on secret trials bill Rachit Buch: UK passes ‘human rights exam’, but with room to improve Assange kills off Pupino, but ambiguity remains – Alex Tinsley Francis Fitzgibbon QC on his Nothing Like The Sun blog considers the matter of COURT DRESS. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
Okay, so I’m back from vacation and trying to stay abreast of what’s going on with the Kramer & Kaslow mass joinder lawsuits, which are being tried by attorney Phillip Kramer whom I interviewed in late February after I received copies of mailings from homeowners soliciting participation in a lawsuit settlement that I found deceptive or misleading. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
And it is equally important that respondents in these applications are not able to introduce so much procedural complexity and substantive assessment as to render the process practically unworkable (see, eg, Park Lawn Corporation v Kahu Capital Partners Ltd (2023) 165 OR (3d) 753, C2023) ONCA 129 (CanLII) (28 February 2023) [38] (Pepall JA; Trotter and Thorburn JJA concurring); Hansman v Neufeld [2023] __ SCR __, 2023 SCC 14 (CanLII) (19… [read post]