Search for: "Ward v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 1,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Rodriguez (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Child Custody Reversed in Clarksville Divorce: Ward v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by WSLL
Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF THOMAS LANKFORD: MAUREEN UTLEY and NORMA BALLWEG v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 256 P.3d 801 [Kansas Supreme Court 2011])State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
The search in this case was within the "workplace" exception to the warrant requirement recognized in O'Connor v Ortega (480 US 709) and Matter of Caruso v Ward (72 NY2d 432). [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm by Charon QC
Bercow and a New Era of ‘Twitter Chill’ David Allen Green, writing at his Jack of Kent blog, considers: The law and culture of phone hacking The UK Human Rights blog analysed the decision in R (on the application of Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2013] 168 (Admin) – read judgment : DEATH PENALTY LEGAL FUNDING REFUSAL: APPEAL COURT CONFIRMS LIMITS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT *** But it isn’t all… [read post]