Search for: "Wells v. Thomas" Results 941 - 960 of 7,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 6:55 am by Steve Vladeck
Sometimes, it’s hard to tell what a Supreme Court decision is about, or what the court has held, until well into the majority opinion. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Rory Little
In fact, the Court said this “just three Terms ago” in Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:         Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio… [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 107690 (SD GA, Aug. 15, 2016), a Georgia federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be allowed to move ahead with most of his claims contending that he was denied meals in accordance with the tenets of his religion.In Thomas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
  In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
  Except, well, it's Maricopa County, and we here at the home office of the Gamso for the Defense blawg haven't been paying much attention to the goings on there since Andy Thomas got his ticket yanked and DOJ finally got around to suing Sheriff Joe.But now, in one week, there's the penalty-phase mistrial and, finally, a decision in Melendres v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 11:28 pm
It is instructive, though, that successful Republican nominees have done well by emphasizing their pragmatism rather than textualism/originalism as such. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
” Judge Doughty – outrageously – omitted the word “published” from the phrase “quick and devastating published take down” as well as the rest of the context. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 11:50 am by Florian Mueller
Some adjustments to the verdict may still happen in the Southern District of California, and then it's on to the Federal Circuit, which will also hear any appeal from the ITC case.For the Quinn Emanuel lawyers representing Qualcomm in this case (led by David Nelson and Sean Pak) as well as some related cases, it's a really nice win and great for their track record. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
It was published in the Georgetown Law Journal, and had been cited in two other court decisions (as well as about 50 law review articles) before this one. [read post]