Search for: "West v. People" Results 941 - 960 of 3,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]
At the turn of the 19th century, the Boston Board of Health quarantined ships arriving from the West Indies, the Mediterranean and other tropical ports to limit the influx of smallpox and other diseases. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am by Susanna Villani (University of Bologna)
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Somewhat analogous proposals in New York and West Virginia have made no headway, but Maryland’s proposal is receiving serious consideration. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario began a mass immunization program in 2009 by focusing on priority groups, starting with pregnant women, children between 6 months to 5 years, people who live with children under 6 months, people under 65 with medical conditions, immune-comprised people and their caregivers, and those living in remote or isolated communities. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]