Search for: "Westchester County v. County of Westchester" Results 941 - 960 of 1,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Herkimer Co. incr sales taxLast Act: 07/11/09 signed chap.111112 A6466 Latimer -- Extends provisions of law relating to the disposition of sales and compensating use tax revenue in the county of Westchester BLURB : Westch. co. sales tax rev distribLast Act: 07/11/09 signed chap.112113 A6564A Zebrowski (MS) -- Authorizes the county of Rockland to establish a surcharge on wireless communications BLURB : County. wireless comm.… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Peter Klose
The clause can elaborately describe the types of lenders, the time frames, the interest rates permitted to finance a certain amount of money needed to purchase a home in Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Columbia, and all counties of New York. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:43 am
Stymiloski, a police officer employed by the Village of Ossining in Westchester County, was engaged in a routine patrol at 6:00 A.M. on December 20, 2005 when he observed that a vehicle parked near the entrance of a 24-hour pharmacy was on fire.After fire department personnel arrived and the fire was fully extinguished, Stymiloski, and two firefighters â€â [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Sexual favoritism which becomes pervasive to the extent of creating a hostile work environment [Priest v Rotary, 634 FSupp 571].See, also, Fella v County of Rockland, 297 A.D.2d 813, where the court, citing DeCintio, explained that there is no sexual discrimination or harassment involved "where the conduct complained of by the employee involves an isolated act of preferential treatment of another employee due to a romantic, consensual relationship. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
When John and Jane later sued DeBellis and the Diocese, the Monroe County Supreme Court dismissed the case. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
  In 2007, 40% member and co-manager MHS Venture filed a petition to dissolve UtiliSave in Westchester County Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
After the Westchester County Supreme Court denied Rose's request to dismiss the lawsuit, he appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:23 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222.* The disciplinary charges filed against Ward alleged that he failed to follow the guidelines relating to the treatment of confidential informants; that he failed to report matters of a police nature to his immediate supervisor; and that he engaged in conduct that brought discredit upon the Department.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Although Supreme Court granted his petition and directed Eastchester to reinstate him to his former position, the Appellate Division vacated the order, without prejudice.The Appellate Division said that a necessary party, the Westchester County Department of Human Resources, had not been named as a respondent in this proceeding by Lazzari and Supreme Court would be required to make "a new determination" in consideration of any "defenses" the County… [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:12 am
Further, "in reviewing a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the facts as alleged in the complaint must be accepted as true, the plaintiff is accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and the court's function is to determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Kupersmith [*2]v Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc., 38 AD3d 847, 848; see Leon v… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:25 am
When the Westchester County Supreme Court dismissed his administrative proceeding challenging the outcome, Jacobsen appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:41 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCivil Practice Forum Selection Clause Interpreted as Requiring Lawsuit's Remand to State Court in Nassau County Yakin v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:06 pm
Despite the insured’s argument that Texas law, as exemplified by the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Matagorda County v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the court ruled that under the circumstances terminating Halpin did not constitute an "excessive penalty. [read post]