Search for: "Wise v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 3,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  Eric Glass advises that “[v]irtually all bonds issued in the municipal market with maturities greater than 10 years come with a 10-year call option to be triggered at the discretion of the issuer”. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:52 am by Estelle J. Tsevdos, Ph.D.
Recently, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Pleicones as stating anything other than the individual views of the case by himself and Justice Hearn.In other words, there were three votes out of five (a majority) to regard the trial court's findings of fact as binding upon the Supreme Court, rather than subject to de novo review. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Pleicones as stating anything other than the individual views of the case by himself and Justice Hearn.In other words, there were three votes out of five (a majority) to regard the trial court's findings of fact as binding upon the Supreme Court, rather than subject to de novo review. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  Whether or not it would have been wise, there seems little doubt that the President constitutionally could have pardoned Arpaio had he been convicted of one of these federal crimes. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Larry
The Court wisely refused to do so. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As the Supreme Court of Canada held in R v. 974649 Ontario Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
As Florida’s 1st DCA wisely noted in 1985, in language adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in Castellanos v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 5:56 pm by John A. Gallagher
  Consequently, if you are broker who believes that you have been subjected to an erroneous, misleading or defamatory U5, contacting counsel is wise. [read post]