Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 9581 - 9600 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This classification imposes undue burdens on their free speech rights by bypassing the necessary procedural safeguards that other entities are afforded, such as detailed justifications for national security concerns that enable judicial review. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This classification imposes undue burdens on their free speech rights by bypassing the necessary procedural safeguards that other entities are afforded, such as detailed justifications for national security concerns that enable judicial review. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In addition, the Court, citing Matter of Town of Waterford, 18 NY3d at 657, indicated that the Government "bears the burden of establishing an exemption. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
My experience is that at least 9 out of 10 contracts contain explicit choice-of-law clauses, which describe in the contract which state's law will govern enforcement.A few years ago, I represented the prevailing defendants in Tradesman Int'l v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
The court of appeals held that the Supreme Court rejected the "due diligence" exception to Brady in Banks v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., an agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers generally should be upheld if not unreasonable or irrational," citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, leave to appeal dismissed, 20 NY3d 995. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But in 2012, deferring to the expertise of prison officials, the Supreme Court held in Florence v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., an agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers generally should be upheld if not unreasonable or irrational," citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, leave to appeal dismissed, 20 NY3d 995. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Oakland Circuit Judge Colleen O'Brien relied on the now-reversed Court of Appeals decision in the People v Koon case, which ruled that even drivers with medical marijuana cards violated the motor vehicle code when driving with THC in their bloodstream. [read post]