Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 32,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 2:59 am
[John O’Brien, Legal NewsLine and Max Brantley, Arkansas Times on State Street Bank and Trust settlement] Update: special master said to find attorney misconduct and recommend substantial fee refund [Chris Villani, Law360 (sub)] “Recent developments have let the air out of slack-fill lawsuits” [Meghana Shah, Brittany Cambre and Amber Unwala, New York Law Journal, earlier on slack fill] Theater-box candy suit: “Don’t squash our Junior Mints” [Chicago… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:37 am
In the 1966 case of People v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:44 pm
The post Recent case provides five reminders about tip pools under California law appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:05 pm
In its 2011 AEP v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:40 pm
“If President Trump fills another vacancy on the court it will have an enormous effect,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley School of Law at the University of California. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:15 am
BuzaMaryland v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:02 am
The issue was squarely raised last week in Facebook v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:58 am
See Doe v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:51 am
Davidson v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:48 am
Yeager v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:43 am
Cal. 2016) (declining to enforce California choice of law provision in user agreement and applying Illinois law and refusing to find that the text of BIPA excludes from its scope all information involving photographs); Patel v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:11 am
His opinion also illustrates a phenomenon I wrote about in a paper forthcoming in the California Law Review, Remedial... [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:49 am
California that phones contain information with a “uniquely sensitive nature. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
California. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:12 pm
(See Murphy v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 2:04 pm
In United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See California v. [read post]
