Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9581 - 9600 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2011, 8:52 pm by Seth Borden
District Court for the District of Columbia, in Sheet Metal Workers Local 15 (Brandon Regional Medical Center), 356 NLRB No. 162 (May 27, 2011), a 3-1 Board majority extended the rationale set forth in Carpenters Local 15006 (Eliason & Knuth of Arizona, Inc.), 355 NLRB No. 159 (2010), which found a union's display of large stationary banners at a secondary employer's premises  -- a hospital -- was not unlawful. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:49 pm by Will Aitchison
The available logs indicate that between August 30, 2006 and April 27, 2008, Ms. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:31 pm by lsammis
Attached is the Inspection Test Electronic Data Form from 1/27/2011 showing that the machine was not in compliance because it says “Compliance No” instead of “Compliance Yes. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:22 am by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
  Minna Kotkin's work, though it focuses on gender imbalance, does touch on letterhead bias (see pp.27-28), but (1) does not come to any hard-and-fast conclusions and (2) lumps together tiers 2, 3, and 4, whereas my sense is that it is far more difficult for professors at fourth-tier schools to get published in top journals than it is for those at second-tier schools. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:17 am by Jeff Gamso
Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361, 368 (1989), overruled by Roper, 543 U.S. at 574; see also Thompson, 487 U.S. at 828 n.27 (reporting that a 10-year-old child was hanged in Louisiana in 1855 and another in Arkansas in 1885). [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Order No. 13 Respondents argued that the ‘732 patent is invalid because it does not name the correct inventors, citing deposition testimony from the two named inventors which allegedly shows that neither contributed to the design of the wind turbine, arm, or light fixture depicted in the patent. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
March 27, 2010) (removal before service allowed forum defendant to be ignored).New Jersey:  Bivins v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:27 am by James Hamilton
Under sections 748 and 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC and the SEC can compensate whistleblowers whose disclosures lead to enforcement actions with penalties of $1 million or more. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Keating, 465 U.S. 1, 9, 17 (1984) (declining to address the class arbitration issue under federal law). [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
The instant litigation so far - Following a bench trial, the district court determined that claims 1-4 of the '551 patent were invalid due to obviousness in light of the '382 patent and U.S. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 1 obligates both States, subject to the provisions of the treaty, to extradite to the other persons charged with or convicted of extraditable offenses. [read post]