Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 11:46 am
,et al, and others similarly situated v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
In Renico v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:38 am
So, when we tell CanLII or our favourite commercial database that we’d like to see R. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Disciplinary charges allege use of inappropriate languageBernstein v Norwich City School District, 282 A.D.2d 70, leave to appeal denied, 96 N.Y.2d 937In May 1998 Richard C. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:26 am
The English High Court, in Loyaltrend Limited and Sye Razvi v Brit UW Limited & Others [2010] EWHC 425 (Comm), ruled in favour of the Second Defendant (Brit) because the Claimants failed to notify the insurer in a timely manner as specified in the policy.The Claimants insured property (a shop) under a continuous insurance policy from 2002 to 2006 through its broker. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:26 am
The English High Court, in Loyaltrend Limited and Sye Razvi v Brit UW Limited & Others [2010] EWHC 425 (Comm), ruled in favour of the Second Defendant (Brit) because the Claimants failed to notify the insurer in a timely manner as specified in the policy.The Claimants insured property (a shop) under a continuous insurance policy from 2002 to 2006 through its broker. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
You can read it for yourself here.The IPKat's friend Colin Birss QC has drawn his attention to a landmark ruling in an American case about patenting genes: AMP v USPTO 09 Civ 4515 (DJ Sweet). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:47 pm
Love In Nazaretyan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Tang v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm
So when Star Wars Celebration V (“SWCV”) was announced for Orlando, August 12 – 15, 2010, I thought it may be an opportunity to do some legal blogging among one of popular culture’s leading franchises. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Comment (April 2010) This judgment is another in a long line of Strasbourg rulings – starting with the controversial Osman v UK – which whittle away at the wide protection enjoyed by public authorities in English tort law as a result of X(Minors) [1995] 2 AC 633. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:14 am
There’s lots to discuss in plain English. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
" Mars, for its part, appealed the verdict, arguing the trial court erred by qualifying Beauregarde as an expert under E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Introduction: Margaret Tabb, Chair of English Department. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
In Vibe Media Group LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
Arsenal FC v. [read post]
