Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 9581 - 9600
of 182,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2007, 1:40 pm
Selya says it doesn't. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
However, if you received damages for emotional distress that wasn't a result of your physical injuries, you could have to pay taxes on this amount.Punitive damages and interest. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm
[T]here's close to a consensus that Democrats can't hold Congress by focusing on Trump.... [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:22 am
A very interesting case out of federal court in Atlanta today provides some important lessons for businesses. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
There's lots of them about legal scholarship, I fear. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
But that’s not the answer that was usually given. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:02 am
While parents have a Fourteenth Amendment right to raise their children without the State’s interference, this isn’t an absolute right. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:04 pm
I imagine that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit share the Air Resources Board’s interest in continuing with the other AB 32 measures. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:56 am
Of course, if one professor wants case names in exam answers and another doesn't, that's worth knowing. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
"Thus, said the court, "[i]t was not unreasonable for SCI to conclude that [Plaintiff's] untimely rebuttal, submitted to the DOE months after it adopted SCI's recommendations, and the almost 10 years that passed from the report's publication before [Plaintiff's] current request, did not compel the report's removal," Further, said the Appellate Division, the Special Commissioner is authorized to… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:50 am
This is where it gets interesting. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:06 am
The GAO's decision in AT&T Government Solutions is noteworthy for three reasons. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
This post contains some parting, case-specific, comments on Canadian common law judicial reasoning for interested Canadian lawyers (or those interested for other reasons) to ponder, related to a few Canadian reasons for judgment delivered late in 2016. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 9:13 am
Plaintiff claimed that planting of drugs in a public place violated his Fourth Amendment rights, which here it wasn’t. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
I don’t know what’s driving this spike, but I suspect it has something to do with the disproportionate growth in Florida’s senior population. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:51 am
I think the case is interesting because it demonstrates a view of the exclusionary rule that I haven’t seen in a while. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:55 pm
As Techdirt’s Tim Cushing (@TimCushing) penned last Friday, technology doesn’t make us less social, it only changes the way we socialize. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
A good cause determination "requires balancing the asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidential. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:07 am
Here is an interesting blog clinic quesiton from student tenant Mandy (not her real name): I am a tenant of a student assured shorthold tenancy with 4 others. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:43 am
Is the Texas Commission on Jail Standards too cozy with the county jails it regulates because it's "dominated by law enforcement interests"? [read post]
