Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 40,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
Bivens v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
Carlos Santaló Goris, Researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg, offers a summary and an analysis of the CJEU Case C-555/18, K.H.K. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 1:48 pm
In Venables v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
From confidentiality to disclosure in 3 Kat-steps(DIY instructions here)By reading the very interesting EU Law Live Blog, The IPKat has discovered an intriguing decision (Herbay v Hungary, Appl. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
In Stone v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:48 pm
In the case of McKenzie v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Tinkler v Ferguson The case of Tinkler -v- Ferguson [2018] EWHC 3563 (QB) concerned a claim by a director of Stobart Group Limited (“Stobart”), against five other members of Stobart’s board of directors of that company. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
The proposal mentions that the arm’s length principle (ALP) would be largely retained. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am
District Court for the District of Oregon issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Doe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
However, it has been identified as a defence in the CJEU case of Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (C-482/09).Hacon HHJ drew on the summary of honest concurrent use from Victoria Plum Ltd v Victorian Plumbing [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) (see IPKat analysis here), which established that it would be possible for two separate entities to co-exist, such that the inevitable confusion that arises has to be tolerated.… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
However, it was not until June 2014, in the later stages of litigation (faced with an application made against Transform to disclose its insurance position), that Travelers and Transform, in reliance upon advice provided under a joint retainer, chose to voluntarily reveal that a large number of the claims were uninsured. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Yelda v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:18 am
Leung v Town of Oyster Bay, 2019 WL 5309995 (EDNY 10/21/2019) [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:18 am
” (See Ewell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm
It is on this issue that the differences to Google v CNIL arise. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 12:15 pm
The efforts of large court technology providers to circumvent and prevent access to public data could have a detrimental impact on innovation in legal analytics. [read post]
