Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 29,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 2:38 am
Here, the Court sets the tone at a foundational level: the Grand Chamber refers to basic constitutional principles of the Union (primacy of Union law, effective implementation of EU law by the courts of the Member States, mutual trust and shared values). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:38 pm
Among other issues, the individual country surveys provide examples of legal measures undertaken to secure the country’s transition to a 'digital republic' (France), efforts to protect data at the company level (Germany), new procedures for breach notifications (Netherlands), and attempts to make government information more easily accessible (Italy). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:25 am
As for Dill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:34 am
Google Books case and in Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:37 am
All things considered, this was a major issue in State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:26 am
Wall also cited a 2006 decision, Hartman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
Guiding Principles have become an important part of the toolkit for managing actors and activity at the international level. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 2:28 pm
WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 2:28 pm
WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:45 am
Article X, Section 6(a) of the Florida Constitution grants similarly broad power at the state level. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
However, given the EU Commission’s statements in its amicus brief in the US Supreme Court US v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
In the 1994 case of Carter v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The effect of the CJEU's decision was that claimants can potentially obtain pan-EU relief against multiple connected defendants located in different Member States, provided that there is an 'anchor' defendant sued in its Member State of domicile.The complexities of the jurisdiction issues raised in Nintendo have been further highlighted in a recent reference by the Court of Appeal to the CJEU in AMS Neve Ltd & Ors v Heritage Audio S.L. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
An instance of compelled speech that rises to the level of a First Amendment violation? [read post]
