Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 16,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Fisher and Florida v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to dismiss infringement complaint in Vincent… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
In Jerman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
From Bixler v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
In last term’s Sessions v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
A couple of months ago, the Federal Circuit vacated in part, reversed in part and remanded TCL v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The original intention of lawmakers was to grant one SPC per product or combination, authorised for the first time. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
Townsend v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Brown, the 2nd District reverses the grant of a motion to suppress. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:27 am
The court in Smith granted the motion to vacate the injunction, based on “the evidence that the Consent Judgment was procured through fraud on the Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
John Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
People with gender dysphoria are said to experience significant mental anxiety and distress because their gender identity differs from their biological sex. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
To my knowledge, the most-relisted case the court has ever granted is eight-time relist District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
