Search for: "People v. More"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
(See, e.g., Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
On this side of the Atlantic, and of more recent vintage, the Supreme Court of Virginia, has held, in accord with King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
After more than a thousand people donated to our Save Podcasting Campaign, we successfully persuaded the USPTO that many examples of podcasting existed years before Personal Audio’s claims, and got those claims invalidated. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:38 am
Salvador Bustamante explains why reality-based thinking about immigration is important: [more...] [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
Many people, I suspect, think it is illegal for officers to trick people in order to gather evidence of a crime (or, as some argue, to create the conduct that's later charged as a crime). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
In a 1969 decision, in Chimel v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 3:24 am
The Ariel Atom Clarkson becomes even more grotesque than normal. 9. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:25 am
Perhaps more damaging was use of the Doctrine in the forced assimilation of Indigenous peoples. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In Bunt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
For more, read The Times on Saturday. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:20 am
Here, Wayne County retirees asserted a class action based on the fact that their supplemental life insurance program through the County changed from its historical flat-rate structure, to an age-based based premium where older individuals paid more than younger people. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:35 pm
Some of the more interesting details: * she had deliberately set her MySpace account as "private," meaning that only her friends (about 300 people) could see her post. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:03 am
From Steele v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
I'm in a stretch where blogging time is limited, and I will have more to say about this case and this transcript later, but as the audience for this blog includes a lot of really sharp people who like to read and interpret documents for themselves, I want to put this out in the public domain. [read post]
