Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 14,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 3:51 am
As a recent court decision shows (Carlson, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
American Library Assn. and Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:51 pm
That came out clearly in the argument on Abramski v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Mason v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:49 pm
All of the fifteen amici filings in the case are on “Amy’s” side, or are neutral in order to make general arguments about how to read statutes. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
A: United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:14 am
While there can be no question that “it is the prerogative of a District Attorney to prosecute people who commit crimes,” it is equally true that “one of the reforms effected through the years in the procedure to dismiss accusatory instruments in the interest of justice was to remove the power to do so from the offices of District Attorney and Attorney–General and lodge it, instead, in the courts alone” (People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:01 am
Here: Native Wholesale Supply v Wasden Cert Petition 1. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 pm
” The decisions in those cases, the attorneys wrote, “could be read as among the ‘authorities’ ” referred to in the new 2011 detention law. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
The basic problem, as Justice Sotomayor explained, is that the statute defines a mass action as one with one hundred or more “plaintiffs,” and this case has only one plaintiff (the Mississippi Attorney General). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:12 pm
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:32 pm
Jim Hood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
Citing Littleton v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Circuit and the other on CAFA not applying to attorneys general. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:55 pm
Hood v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
Solicitor General, had his own challenging opening moment. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
