Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 42,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 4:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company et. al) and the other in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division (Duane Easler v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
Earlier this week, a team that included Kevin Russell, Pam Karlan, and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic filed this Motion to Dismiss or Affirm in No. 07-77, Riley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Last week, a venerable three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a well-intentioned but analytically confounding ruling in a highly contentious dispute between the federal government and the State of Missouri. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:46 am
The case, Broadnax v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
United States (07-548) (see here) and on Friday in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:10 pm
Behrend) even the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
See Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
In Van Buren v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm
Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
We posted about Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm
" The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
Wisconsin State Legislature, 592 U. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
She confirms that the court hopes to give its decision early next week and adjourns proceedings. 1515: Lord Pannick QC ends his submissions. 1512: Lord Pannick QC sums up that if the court makes a declaration that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful then it would be for Parliament to reconvene and for them to decide what to do next. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
Highlights this week included: Folk hero and/or cyberthief? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
