Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 9581 - 9600 of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am by Florian Mueller
This week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit scheduled its hearing on the Apple-Google (Motorola) cross-appeal of Judge Posner's dismissal of a two-way patent infringement action in the Northern District of Illinois in the late spring of 2012. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Edwards was clearly offended by my essay; he is not the last judge who has castigated the general trend of academic scholarship to become, well, more “academic” and of less, if any, interest to the bench and bar. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 12:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Calligeros later sued the company and certain of its directors and officers in a California state court action in which Calligeros alleged that he was induced to sign the RSA based on allegedly fraudulent misrepresentations. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Court Debates Using Shell Companies to Mask Political Donations Bloomberg Law – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 1/10/2020 A federal appeals court panel heard arguments over the use of shell companies to hide donations in a case that could affect super PAC disclosure in the 2020 election. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:26 am by Lawrence Taylor
In a study entitled An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California: Report to the Legislature of the State of California, the California DMV concluded: The expected effect that an IID order/restriction issued by the court would result in a lower rate of subsequent DUI convictions was not observed. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Laches: The analogous California statute of limitations period, for claims of fraud, is three years. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Valentine’s Day Massacre, the Honorable Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California reconsidered and reversed his November 2018 Blockvest decision, sending a powerful message about the illegality of so-called initial coin offerings. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by MOTP
Partially dissenting justices would not have ruled as sweepingly, but would have denied recovery in the case at bar. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 4:54 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
  Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA) has ordered California state officials to begin dismantling thousands of homeless encampments. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:44 am by Dennis Wilkins
This time, it is the judiciary.There is an article in the August California Bar Journal entitled "Protections Urged for Judges. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Rachel Sandler
The Act grants the USOC exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” in almost any commercial setting.[7]  In 1987, the United States Supreme Court enjoined a California-based athletics company from using the word “Olympics” finding that the Act went beyond normal trademark protections. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
J: After the United States led the world to adopt the Washington Principles in 1998, survivors and their heirs were losing in court on time-bar grounds, such as the statute of limitations, civil law prescription doctrine, or the equitable doctrine of laches. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Kennedy, No. 07-77 In a case concerning section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court rules that a covered state need not obtain fresh preclearance required by section 5 in order to reinstate an election practice prevailing before the enactment of an election law struck down by the state's supreme court. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
Nike, where the California Supreme Court gave the green light to suits against companies under the states consumer protection statute where the company had the audacity to defend itself against politically oriented attacks.We beg to differ. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:10 am by Todd Janzen
LinkedIn claimed that continuing to access LinkedIn after permission was expressly revoked was a violation of the CFAA.hiQ asked the Northern District Federal Court in California for a preliminary injunction prohibiting LinkedIn from barring hiQ from scraping publicly available data provided by LinkedIn. [read post]