Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 9581 - 9600 of 13,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Terry Moritz
  The Ninth Circuit, relying on a decision by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Chris Jones
Here, Bloomberg brings us up to speed on the goings on at the hearings. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court did not expressly address the subpoena served on Bank of New York. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Does 1-18 (Internet Cases) Hotfile – Warner betrays Hotfile, Hotfile sues for fraud (Public Knowledge) Oracle – Judge throws out Google’s summary judgment on copyright almost entirely (FOSS Patents) Righthaven – Lawyer wants US Marshals to seize copyright troll’s bank account (ArsTechnica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit finds web host liable for its customers’ trademark infringement: Louis Vuitton… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:06 pm by Brad Pauley
US Bank NA (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 168, that: (1) the Bank Act, as impliedly amended by the ADA, preempts FEHA to the extent that FEHA conflicts with the Bank Act’s “dismiss at pleasure” provision (12 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 12:56 pm by Douglas Reiser
They’re often used for schools, banks, restaurants, hospitals, medical clinics, daycare centers and even correctional facilities, to name a few. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:51 am by Doug Cornelius
Alleges Poker Site Stacked Deck by Alexandra Berzon in the Wall Street Journal First Amended Complaint in US v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
:  09-076/09-090/09-091   Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
With respect to shares of an open-end company as defined in section 5(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“mutual fund”), you may use the mutual fund’s transfer agent in lieu of a qualified custodian for purposes of complying with paragraph (a) of this section; 2. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Jean Sternlight
  The five-four decision held that courts’ use of California’s Discover Bank test for whether an arbitral class action waiver is unconscionable was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]