Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 21,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
(Under the law of the land, do the other 24 states still face the penalty for not expanding their Medicare eligibility even after NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
United States 14-1121Issue: (1) Whether a foreign seller's conduct can “involv[e] *** import trade or import commerce” even when the seller himself does not import any goods into the United States; (2) whether a foreign price-fixing agreement can have an effect on U.S. commerce that is “direct” and “gives rise to” a Sherman Act claim even when the agreement fixes prices only in foreign sales; and (3) whether… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:44 pm
” In support of his submission that the President has broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs, the Secretary quotes United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
(Gary Cameron/Reuters) On Monday, in Zivotovsky v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
For employees of faith, this is good news. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
That means it’s a good book? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a portion of the… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:14 pm
In the recent case of Critical Care Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
State of California (Gaming Compact; Good Faith Negotiations; Land Into Trust)Sorace v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:27 am
Supreme Court just explained in Commil United States, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
” Hugh Williamson: an express prohibition on ex post facto laws by states “may do good here, because the Judges can take hold of it. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The “good news” is that the Court resolved three of its eleven outstanding relists this week. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm
If you would like a courtesy consultation before filing a trademark application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office, kindly contact our office. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
Finally, the state legislature of the state wherein the land is located would then have to approve the agreement. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:45 am
Circuit’s Hall v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:23 am
Brink v. [read post]
