Search for: "W. D." Results 9581 - 9600 of 13,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm
"  Now, I'd never even heard of "Mixed Race Studies"! [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:20 am
"We’d like to apologize again for the mistakes we made with Buzz. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:53 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
Employers may voluntarily report the value of health benefits they provide on 2011 W-2s, but this will not be mandatory until the 2012 forms. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
., Manhattan Prohibited as of June 23, 2010 Ulyses Beary 2949 W 28th St., 6th fl., Brooklyn Alice Brooks Seth Low Houses, 131 Belmont Ave., 1st fl., Brooklyn Christopher Brooks Seth Low Houses, 131 Belmont Ave., 1st fl., Brooklyn Shamar Calloway Hammel Houses, 84-14 Rockaway Beach Blvd., 3rd fl., Queens Gabriel Carmichael Queensbridge North Houses, 40-07 12th St., 5th fl., Queens James Gibbons Mariner's Harbor Houses, 153 Brabant St., 4th fl., Staten Island… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:08 am by Larry Bodine
I thought I'd never see the day, but lawyers are offering discount coupons with MerchantCircle, a Los Altos, California, start-up company which helps small businesses reach local customers through referrals based on on-line advertising. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:41 am by David Ingram
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission brought a similar case in Tennessee during the George W. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:27 am by David Vasella
Vor BGer war zunächst strittig, ob es sich beim Mietobjekt um eine Familienwohnung iSv OR 266m f. handelte; in diesem Fall wäre die Kündigung mit einem Formfehler behaftet gewesen (keine Zustellung an die Ehefrau, OR 266n). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm by Idaho State Police
IDAHO STATE POLICE NEWS RELEASE - generated by our News Release ListServerDO NOT REPLY---------------------------------------------------------------------------Idaho State PoliceRegional Communication Center - North615 W Wilbur AveSuite A Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815(208) 209-8620 FAX: (208) 209-8619CASE # C11000783--------------------- PRESS RELEASE -----------------------------DATE: 03/28/11 TIME: 3:22 pm LOCATION: SB SH41 at Hayden Ave INVESTIGATING… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:38 pm by dginsberg
Debbie Ginsberg Educational Technology Librarian IIT Downtown Campus Library 565 W. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:52 am by Eva Rosenberg
[Note: If you were subscribed to the e-mailed TaxQuips, you’d be getting other exciting news and tips by e-mail, that never appear on the site. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm by Juana Vasella
Dass im Rahmen von Kontrollen in der Vergangenheit offenbar keine Beanstandungen erfolgt waren, lässt allenfalls mit der Vorinstanz den Schluss zu, der Beschwerdeführer habe annehmen dürfen, dass alles in Ordnung sei, was Eventualvorsatz ausschliesst. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:26 am by Jeffrey
RT @Lawyer4ERISA: Left 2 y/o w/out diaper this evening before bath. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:08 pm by Apeng
(KEI) Microsoft commences patent infringement proceedings before W D Washington and ITC against Barnes & Noble over Android-based e-reader and tablet devices  / ?????????????????????? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
 i4i (Patently BIOtech) Microsoft – Microsoft commences patent infringement proceedings before W D Washington and ITC against Barnes & Noble over Android-based e-reader and tablet devices (ArsTechnica) (ITC Law Blog) (IP Watch) (IPBiz) Microsoft – US DOJ: Invalidating an issued patent should require clear and convincing evidence: Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
" 4320(i) does not require evidence of any kind of conviction, although of course that would be relevant - and it cuts both ways: It gives the court discretion to award more spousal support just as well as giving the court to deny spousal support, upon "[d]ocumented evidence. [read post]