Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 19,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm
” City of Naples Airport Authority v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
Here’s the abstract of Reining in the Purcell Principle: About a month before the 2014 election, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of four extraordinary orders in election law cases. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
The Court also found, as an alternative basis for dismissing the complaint, that Glendale’s statue conveyed a message that was actually consistent with United States foreign policy. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Then, in Gebser v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
On December 16, 2014 – almost three whole weeks ago – the Solicitor General filed his brief responding the Supreme Court’s request for the government’s views in the case called Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:35 am
In Moura v Cunha, the mother allowed a friend, Cunha, allegedly, the child's godmother, to bring the child, Luana, from Brazil, her country of residence, to the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After six marvellous months with Marie-Andrée, Rebecca and Lucas, it is now time to meet Valentina, Suleman and Tom.* The New USPTO Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter EligibilitySuleman’s debut post is about the new United States Patent and Trademark Office's Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility, which has the purpose of assisting the USPTO staff in examination and post-grant proceedings to determine whether claimed subject matter is eligible… [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
V, VI, IX, and XIV,NJ Constitution 1, paras.1, 10, and 2], and requirements stated in Miranda v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
It can probably manage C:\dir > print.txt United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm
Quinn (see here); Illinois State Employees Association v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
The other, which has gotten less attention [though Jon Adler did have a pointer to it here on the VC last week], is the DC Circuit’s decision to enter a default judgment against the government of North Korea in Kim v Democratic Republic of North Korea. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
UPS, I predict the court will punt on the issue of the extent of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, deferring to the United States’ brief recommending the same thing. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
CAIR has announced the filing last week of a religious discrimination lawsuit against the United States Navy on behalf of a former barracks instructor whose reenlistment was blocked. [read post]
