Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 9601 - 9620 of 10,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Thame, 846 F.2d 200, 205-08 (3d Cir. 1988); United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:53 pm
Absher describes does not take into account the possibility that an item of mail might get misplaced or lost anywhere between the desk at which it is printed and the United States Post Office. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:22 am
A11317 Last Act: 05/27/08 REFERRED TO RULES Last Action Date: 05/28/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:14 pm
Crime and Consequences reports that the Federalist Society has a new podcast available discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:20 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), under Alan Morrison's tutelage, I learned far more about the Appointments Clause than any reasonable lawyer would want to know. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:03 am
Rogers wrote (p. 8), referring to a 1995 report, "only the United States prints bills that are identical in size and color in all denominations. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166, finding them equally applicable here: Courts, however, must consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the Government's interest . . . . [read post]