Search for: "Charles Law" Results 9601 - 9620 of 18,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Feb. 3, 2009), Judge Charles Breyer denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's Unfair Competition Law claim that "high fructose corn syrup" is not produced by a natural process, thus making it misleading to label pasta sauce containing it as "all natural. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 7:44 pm
As detailed above, NY rent laws require rent stabilized tenant's apartments to be their primary residence. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Again, as set forth in the prior decision, “New York law does not provide a single statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Again, as set forth in the prior decision, “New York law does not provide a single statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
They lived together since 2001 and Ms Charles provided Ms Rhuppiah accommodation in exchange for her care without which Ms Charles would face formidable difficulties and seek state care. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:07 am by Glen P. Trudel
Similarly, Charles Honig, a Managing Counsel of the Office of Regulations in the Research, Markets, and Regulations Division of the CFPB, and a panelist at the event, also declined to give a specific date for publication, but did raise some interesting points. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:51 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Failure to Obey 4/21 – E 18th St & Vineyard 4/24 – Hamburg St & Charles Way Fraud – Credit Card 4/25 – unknown location in Oakley Fraud – False Pretenses 4/23 – 100 block Zartop St. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:03 pm by Yesenia Garcia Perez
Last November, Charles Strickler, a former Board attorney, petitioned the NLRB to reverse its stance and again find that Weingarten rights apply to nonunion employees. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:44 pm by Jay Knispel
The post 2015 New York Techweek appeared first on Law Offices of Jay S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:33 am by Jon Sheldon
 Geared for consumers, counselors, paralegals, and even attorneys new to consumer  law, experienced attorneys regularly take advantage of our $8 bulk price to order 100 books at a time as handouts for clients and others. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 9:15 am by Shane McCall
Task force tells agencies how to handle court injunction on vaccine mandate [FedNewsNet]Contractors mull the practical realities of the Supreme Court ruling against vaccine mandates [FedNewsNet]A new mechanism to help agencies avoid buying counterfeit products [FedNewsNet]Army working to deploy first OCONUS cloud system in the Indo-Pacific [FedScoop]Robin Carnahan on GSA’s role making ‘the damn websites work’ [FedScoop]White House Praises DOD Acquisition Professionals for COVID-19… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:41 pm
Orr and Heygood were assisted in the case by HORP&B Partner Charles Miller. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:38 am by John Steele
    The rule was approved by a majority of the Court, with Justices Charles W. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:42 am by Stéphane Erickson
, by Éric Lallier Legal update discussing top 12 Q&A in E&L, including guidance on compensation practices in Quebec Publication date: March 13, 2020 COVID-19 in 12 questions: Update and status report for Quebec employers, by Éric Lallier Legal update discussing leaves, and general obligations in terms of accommodation, employee refusals, and OH&S in Quebec Publication date: February 2020 Better safe than sorry: Useful information for employers on coronavirus outbreak, by… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:13 am by Dennis Crouch
 In a forthcoming article titled “Wrongly Affirmed Without Opinion” (Wake Forest Law Review), I raise the previously unnoticed requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:32 am by gmlevine
Web Ventures, Nerdec, Inc. and Charles Edmunds, D2009-1684 (WIPO January 29, 2010) (“If save for consent, the facts suggest that a domainname had been registered and used in bad faith, then it is the respondent that bears the burden of proof that the Complainant consented to that activity. [read post]