Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 11,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
If the algorithm was not exposed to many non-native English speakers when it was first developed, it could be biased to approving native speakers. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:28 am
On the 26 April 2017, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments on this issue in Sandoz v Amgen. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes of both States (but the amount of… [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm
Ok, if you look at the Heller case—and I'm talking about the DC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 5:52 pm
Some of the classic cases, like Buchanan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications, 2010 v, 157 p. ; 28 cm. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Canada, these languages are English and French. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm
Find those lost weird and wonderful words that make the English so rich. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
In Kanika Mukherjee v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
Don't Hand Out Rewards So Easily" pjblack.me/xaGR2h Stephen Fry (Image via RottenTomatoes.com) it's not just english judges: "Stephen Fry on the techno-cluelessness of English judges" pjblack.me/xlUF4N is violence explained by history, not biology or psychology? [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am
This report tells us the result (in English) but is otherwise insufficient. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:46 am
I didn’t cite the relevant case, he says: U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
It is easy for lawyers--in the United States and other legal cultures descended from the English common-law system--to forget that this need not be the case: in civil law systems, court decisions do not create binding precedents! [read post]
