Search for: "House v. House" Results 9601 - 9620 of 41,239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that the Homelessness (Suitability of Accommodation) Order 1996 requires the authority to take into account all sources of income, including all social security benefits, and there is nothing in it to require or justify the exclusion of non-housing benefits of any kind. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 12:57 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Back in 2007 they knocked down 69 council houses as part of the New Deal for Communities, regeneration deal, which was earmarked to include a gym, library, community centre and houses, 41 of which were to be social housing, which earned them criticism and threats from the GLA at the time for the loss of council homes. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:13 am by Vishnu Kannan
Trump and the Trump legal team’s brief in the case of Trump v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:35 am by CMS
Jennifer offers a preview here of the appeal pending in the matter of MacDonald and another v Carnbroe Estates Ltd,  on appeal from the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:09 pm by Mikhaila Fogel
The legal team on behalf of President Trump and the Trump Organization has filed a brief in the case of Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm by Robert Chesney
Justice Breyer was the lone dissenter from this denial (though he couched his dissent as a “statement” accompanying the denial rather than a dissent as such): In Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Nill v Schneider  2019 NY Slip Op 04392  Decided on June 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department, there was a departure, but the Court found no proximate damage. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 In particular, I think it is important to note that some of the programs that are being much discussed by Democrats, particularly "insurgents" in the House of Representatives, are primarily "talk. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
It’s also not tit for tat: No one ever assigns a specific value to the meat or cake or house-building labor, meaning debts can’t be transferred.And, in a gift economy, exchange isn’t impersonal. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am by INFORRM
Open justice v parental protectiveness The court considered the matter against the baseline principle of open justice laid down by the House of Lords (then the highest court in the land) in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]