Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 29,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2009, 9:47 pm
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court (Atwater v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
” Lawyers v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:38 pm
Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:29 pm
Weitz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Is Delaware law as stated in MacRitchie consistent with Dodge v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:03 pm
" United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
Had HMRC failed to meet the level of certainty required by the word “would” in subsection 205(3)(b)? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:25 am
” As to the ruling on grandparent visitation, the court turned to the level of harm that must be demonstrated, quoting from the Slawinski v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am
But, doubtful readers, rest assured that Terry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The appellate panel began by citing Vakharia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:33 am
Louisiana said it supports a grant of review of the Michigan case, DeBoer v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am
Another Supreme Court decision, the ruling in April in Schuette v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
The bill is in committee in the State Senate. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:08 am
More recently, the Delhi High Court in Delhi Towers Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
