Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 55,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 3:30 am
More cryptically, even detailed discussions of nondelegation precedent, such as Justice Gorsuch’s recent romp in Gundy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:33 am
And today's Supreme Court decision in FEC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:09 pm
Second, iiNet did not have a relevant power to prevent those infringements occurring. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Times, Ronald Collins/Concurring Opinions, video from Baca v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:18 am
Aronson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:36 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:20 pm
The Los Angeles City Council formally voted to oppose SB466, introduced earlier this year by Senator Bob Dutton, which would allow for structured negotiations regarding the transfer of ONT to a newly formed joint powers agency comprised of Ontario and San Bernardino. [read post]
Courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform an arbitration award to its sense of justice
23 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
" Further, opined the court, an arbitrator "exceed[s] [his or her] power within the meaning of the CPLR only when [he or she] issue[s] an award that violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Moreover, as Chief Justice Marshall noted in Marbury v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 11:12 am
I think if the Court already had overruled Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 9:15 am
Others tried to undermine Alice v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
Courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform an arbitration award to its sense of justice
23 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
" Further, opined the court, an arbitrator "exceed[s] [his or her] power within the meaning of the CPLR only when [he or she] issue[s] an award that violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said Supreme Court, it had "no power to substitute another interpretation" in considering the arguments advanced by Petitioner. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:19 am
Everyone agrees that Erie Railroad v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said Supreme Court, it had "no power to substitute another interpretation" in considering the arguments advanced by Petitioner. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
