Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 23,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
In 2004, it began selling shirts and caps bearing the subject marks, purchasing the items from an Illinois company. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:52 am
He contacted Gibb, who started working to sell the tract even though he didn’t have a brokerage agreement. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:13 pm
NNN v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
” In this action, plaintiffs sued defendant Anheuser Busch Inbev Worldwide, Inc. and other companies that sell or distribute beverages containers in California . . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:27 am
Selling a condo “as is” does not protect the seller against a water damage hidden defect claim, as the buyers learned in the case of Syvrud v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
For example, in Fulk v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:53 pm
Facts: In 2006 and 2007, three married couples (the "Borrowers") contacted realtors to express interest in selling their current homes and purchasing new ones. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
’s trademarks by selling diamond engagement rings bearing the renowned jewelry retailer’s name. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:03 am
Orange Bang, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:17 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
As such, "[t]here may be an infringement of the exclusive distribution right, under Article 4(1) of [the InfoSoc Directive], where a trader, who does not hold the copyright, sells protected works or copies thereof and addresses an advertisement, through its website, by direct mail or in the press, to consumers located in the territory of the Member State in which those works are protected in order to invite them to purchase it. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
The way that the problems were addressed in the NSW Supreme Court in Chow v Chow (No 1) [2015] NSWSC 1347 contain pearls of wisdom. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 10:56 pm
Rural Building of Cincinnati v Village of Evendale, 2015 WL 1932542 (OH. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
-E.U. agreement, Stewart skeptically disparages the premature celebration of what he considers a sell-out by the Department of Justice negotiators. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:57 pm
For the factual background of this Apple v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:42 pm
Another significant case involving a no oral modification clause is Tidwell v. [read post]
