Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 13,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
Sources: United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent and Trademark Office-Trademarks Home California Secretary of State-Trademarks and Service Marks Model State Trademark Law/CA. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2011 WL 768649 (6/16/11) (blogged here) the Supreme Court of the United States held that a District Court's denial of a Rule 23 class certification motion does not prevent separate plaintiffs from seeking certification in a separate state court action. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
; Case 4:09-CV-00456-A in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:35 pm
Carnival, the United States Supreme Court required a passenger who lived in Oregon, and injured during a cruise from California to Mexico, to file suit here in Miami. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Court then explained: The United States Supreme Court, however, in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm
Expect that the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of California Grocers Association v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
The class named in the suit (Ernest Michael Bakenie v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
" People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The NLRB did not apply the United States' Supreme Court's holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm
See also California v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
The court decided to follow and apply a two-part test rendered by the California Court of Appeal in Gemini Aluminum Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
But Chief Judge Roberts has previously voted against government interference in the marketplace of idea in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
