Search for: "State v. Light" Results 9601 - 9620 of 28,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court yesterday, in light of its decision this week in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports that the justices “sent two sets of cases about aid to religious schools back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of their opinion on Monday that a church preschool could not be excluded from a state grant program to improve playgrounds. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm by sarahjaneewart
This case is interesting to read in the light of the “Charedi transgender” case covered in our recent post, which will be considered the Court of Appeal in November. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
This morning’s order list sent four cases back to the state courts for them to take another look in light of yesterday’s decision in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Search of car Late one morning in October 2015, Officer Dan Grimes of the Frederick City Police Department (“FCPD”) stopped Joseph Scott Bryant (“Appellant” “Bryant”), who was driving a car with a broken tail light and appeared nervous at the sight of two police cars. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Second, even assuming that there was evidence that some facts stated by McMahon about plaintiff Welter (and then reported by the press) were false, and even if there were any reason to believe that the statements from McMahon falsely accused Welter with actual malice on McMahon’s part, the defamation and false light invasion of privacy claims were [barred by the statute of limitations] …. [read post]