Search for: "State v. Save" Results 9601 - 9620 of 11,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
It was clear that the way the claim was drafted would not be enough to save it, and so referring to hardware was not sufficient to become eligible. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm by Stephen Page
Neither is it open for anyone to do so either: Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11, at 72, per Heydon, Crennan, Bell JJ; and indeed, had the transcript been different than the transcript provided by the official transcriber, it would constitute a serious offence as an officer of the court. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am by Florian Mueller
" Tellingly, Google itself cited foreign decision in its submission, and the CCI specifically names last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
By bringing together relevant stakeholders, the Forum aids in identifying trends, challenges and good practices in the implementation of the Guiding Principles by States and business enterprises, as well as by other stakeholders, including challenges faced in particular sectors, operational environments or in relation to specific rights or groups." [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:35 am
Over the past decade, the LGBTQ+ community has experienced significant benefits as state and federal laws have recognized their rights. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:05 am by Léon Dijkman
In particular, it chronicles Pat Brown's mission to "save the planet from environmental catastrophe". [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm by Cory Doctorow
" They care when their mechanic can't fix their car any longer, or the insulin for their artificial pancreas goes up 1000 percent, or when security experts announce that they can't audit their state's voting machines. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The application sought to repress the unauthorized use of Banksy's registered trade marks and reproductions of his/her artworks in the context of an art exhibition in Milan.The text of the decision in RG 52442/2018 Pest Control Office Limited v 24 Ore Cultura s.r.l. is available here.Let's see what happened.BackgroundThe applicant, Pest Control Office, is responsible for issuing certificates of authenticity re Banksy's artworks, and for selling his artworks and organizing… [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Unknown
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Jim Duffy
  These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and procedures are… [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 5:08 am by SHG
So it comes as no shock that the New Jersey Supreme Court held that section 3 of the Bias Intimidation law, N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1, was rejected as unconstitutional in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm by Joseph Grodin
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
" In 2001 the Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Davis v. [read post]