Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 15,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
” Fintak at 184 (citing Head v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
(Korsak v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
Marriott International Inc. and Marriott Worldwide Corporation v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
(Loth v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:58 am
After settling with several lower layer carriers, J.P. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:58 am
After settling with several lower layer carriers, J.P. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
The following argument recap of Golan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
A prime example was Bush v Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court was called on to resolve an election dispute. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:13 pm
See O’Brien v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
It is well settled that the amount of damages to be awarded for personal injuries is primarily a question for the jury, and great deference is given to its interpretation of the evidence and findings of fact, provided there is sufficient credible evidence to support the findings (see Yasquez v Jacobowitz, 284 AD2d 326 (2d Dept. 2001). [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:05 am
Norwest Corp., 493 S.E.2d 114 (Va. 1997); State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:05 am
Norwest Corp., 493 S.E.2d 114 (Va. 1997); State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
The Bakkers’ case eventually settled. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
(SEC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
However, on 31 January 2011, the solicitors acting for His Holiness wrote to the Court stating that they were “without instructions” in relation to both the application and the appeal and stating that they were in the process of making an application to come off the record. [read post]
