Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 42,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 9:46 am
The case, Broadnax v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company et. al) and the other in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division (Duane Easler v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
United States (07-548) (see here) and on Friday in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Last week, a venerable three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a well-intentioned but analytically confounding ruling in a highly contentious dispute between the federal government and the State of Missouri. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
See Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
In Van Buren v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:10 pm
Behrend) even the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm
Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
We posted about Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
Wisconsin State Legislature, 592 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm
" The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
She confirms that the court hopes to give its decision early next week and adjourns proceedings. 1515: Lord Pannick QC ends his submissions. 1512: Lord Pannick QC sums up that if the court makes a declaration that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful then it would be for Parliament to reconvene and for them to decide what to do next. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-9711, Jackson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
Highlights this week included: Folk hero and/or cyberthief? [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
(argued August 17, 2016) State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Police officers knocked on doors to identify those who had been exposed, and the City contacted state and local agencies to help deal with the environmental and public health emergency. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
("ITP") sued the Attorney General of the State of Tennessee in his official capacity.1 They claim that the State of Tennessee has violated federal antitrust law and the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
