Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9601 - 9620 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
 The court decided to follow and apply a two-part test rendered by the California Court of Appeal in Gemini Aluminum Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
But Chief Judge Roberts has previously voted against government interference in the marketplace of idea in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
 Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
 Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am by Mike Scarcella
They also said a judgment against Nguema “will infringe Equatorial Guinea’s sovereign right to create, interpret, and enforce its own laws and will significantly hinder the existing cooperative, friendly relationship between the United States and Equatorial Guinea. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:28 am by Brad Kuhn
Proposition 13 has led to another interesting property valuation battle between county tax assessors and petroleum refineries, and the California Court of Appeal recently issued a published decision, Western States Petroleum Association v.  [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:28 am by Brad Kuhn
  Proposition 13 has led to another interesting property valuation battle between county tax assessors and petroleum refineries, and the California Court of Appeal recently issued a published decision, Western States Petroleum Association v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm by Remy Kessler
Concluding that the class claims were not barred as a matter of law, the Bridgeford court relied substantially on the United States Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:25 am by Sarah Kovit
San Diego at night The United States District Court for the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Thalheimer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:07 am by Tom Goldstein
United States (No. 10-7515), which will likely be sent back to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Kali Borkoski
The third and final opinion of the day was in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by marcorandazza
A man was arrested for wearing a jacket with a political message on it while in the history exhibit at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) involved a derivative claim brought in the United States District Court for New Jersey against Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation, a Delaware corporation doing business in New Jersey. [read post]