Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 9601 - 9620 of 21,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 6:27 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 18-1230 Issue: Whether a search-warrant application that fails to provide any particularized nexus between an individual’s alleged drug-trafficking activity and the individual’s residence can provide probable cause for a warrant to search the residence. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Mom reasserts her First Amendment rights (as well as Equal Protection) under the United States Constitution (applicable via the 14th Amendment) and under the Nevada Constitution. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 11:30 am by Isabel McArdle
The Immigration Act 1971 section 3 allows the Secretary of State to have people in the UK deported, who are not British citizens, if the Secretary of State deems that to be conducive to the public good. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Samsung, stating: “We are bound by what the statute says, irrespective of policy arguments that may be against it”[xiii]. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
There was very good news for the petitioner in our reigning relist champ, Christeson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:50 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by Cindy Cohn
Nothing in the bill is intended to limit or otherwise prevent the use of any type of encryption within the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:10 pm by Larry
United States involves the tariff classification of prepared tempura vegetables. [read post]