Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 9621 - 9640 of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 3:50 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by Cindy Cohn
Nothing in the bill is intended to limit or otherwise prevent the use of any type of encryption within the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:10 pm by Larry
United States involves the tariff classification of prepared tempura vegetables. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides  that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am by Stewart Baker
Details are still a little sparse, but some kind of deal was essential for the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
’…An individual is held ‘in custody’ by the United States when the United States official charged with his detention has ”the power to produce’ him,” citing an 1855 decision. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
At the same time, critics of the administrative state have called into question authority of administrative agencies to adjudicate claims in light of Article III’s command that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested” in courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-1279Issues: (1) Whether states that have exercised their historic power to escheat title to abandoned U.S. savings bonds may redeem those bonds as successor owners, as the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by MBettman
Johnson, Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-5021, also decided in 2014, used the good-faith exception to save evidence seized from a warrantless GPS placement on a car, now impermissible since United States v. [read post]