Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 7:59 pm
Larry Catá Backer, Case Note: Rights And Accountability In Development (Raid) V Das Air (21
July 2008) And Global Witness V Afrimex (28 August 2008); Small Steps Toward an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations, Melbourne Journal of International Law 10(1):258-307 (2009). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
I hope I don't say too many controversial things such that it becomes my last! [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:10 am
Circuit Court’s opinion in Canning v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
It seems fair to say that this approach to pleading would dispense with any showing of a reasonably founded hope that a plaintiff would be able to make a case; Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Merpel keeps misreading 'Minister for Intellectual Property' as 'Minister for Ineffectual Puffery': let's hope she's wrong ... [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
In fact, I made a correction earlier today to last week's report on Judge Voss's order to stay a Samsung v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:02 am
I felt right with myself; and I hoped it was legal to do it, I’m hoping still. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm
In its Macy v Holder decision, the commission stated that “intentional discrimination against a transgender individual because that person is transgender is, by definition, discrimination ‘based on …sex,’ and such discrimination therefore violates Title VII. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Div. of Judges Nov 06, 2012); Convergys Corporation and Hope Grant, NO. 14-CA-075249, 2012 WL 5494972 (N.L.R.B. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:31 am
Some of the more cryptic opinions to come out of the South Carolina Supreme Court simply state “We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in [case name]. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
Some accounts state that they have shelved the statute and the organisation (see W New). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:25 am
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
