Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 9621 - 9640
of 42,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Or it may have little/no further value on the market, in which case neither design nor © is of interest to investors. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
So broad a definition as to be almost meaningless, but allows us to ask interesting questions. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
[I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.] [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 8:37 am
Chapman’s “rights’ privileges or interests,” her right to procedural fairness was triggered. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
The post The A B C’s of Workplace Safety appeared first on Work Comp Roundup. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
Procedural requirements, such as the drawing and color claim requirements at issue in this case, ensure “the public’s interest in timely and adequate notice of the marks on file at the Office. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
The 2011 will was not expressly revived as required by statute (755 ILCS 5/4-7(c): “A will which totally revoked in any manner is not revived other than by its re-execution or by an instrument declaring the revival and signed and attested in the manner prescribed by this article for the signing and attestation of a will”), nor did decedent express any interest in reviving the 2011 will. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:34 pm
Karlan – Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and Co-Director, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Stanford Law School Karlan Testimony – Karlan Bio Professor Jonathan Turley – J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:00 am
An interesting dissonance is visible in the authors’ view regarding CVD interpretation. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:56 pm
This may include offering to enter into an NDA if confidentiality interests are concerned. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
While it has been held that Section 21005(c) “does not require [an] appellate court to address additional alleged defects that may be addressed in a completely different and more comprehensive manner upon CEQA review following remand” (id. at 682), that judicially created exception to Section 21005(c)’s rule was neither cited nor even obliquely referred to in the Second District’s reasoning here. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:34 pm
" … [Such speech can be restricted if] "seeks to implement a substantial governmental interest," … "directly advances that interest," and … "is no more extensive than is necessary to achieve that interest. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:22 am
“C corporation” any time after Aug. 9, 1993 (Section 1202(c)(1)); issued by a corporation whose aggregate gross assets must not exceed $50 million at any time from Aug. 9, 1993, through the date of issuance of the QSBS (including immediately after issuance of the QSBS, but after that, the size of the corporation’s assets are not restricted—which means that the corporation could be much larger on the date the taxpayer sells the QSBS and it will still qualify… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:38 am
NON FOOD-PRODUCING MINOR SPECIES Awaiting nominations FOOD-PRODUCING SPECIES Awaiting nominations Interested parties should submit nominations for additional bulk drug substances as described in the #256 Appendix. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” The latter, § 201(c), prohibits merely the acceptance of “anything of value” “otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:07 pm
” (Proposed section 135(a) & (c)). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:07 pm
” (Proposed section 135(a) & (c)). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
The CJEU’s ruling, which I examine in more detail in Section C.1 below, held that injunctions covering both identical and equivalent content are permitted by the eCommerce Directive, but that the injunctions must not require the platform to independently assess whether content violates the law. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
The Senate’s sergeant at arms, Michael C. [read post]
