Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 21,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 7/30/09Cite: IBM v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Waterman in Gagnon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:06 am
The case at issue is styled, Mirna Guzman v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 5:35 pm
Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:23 am
Silk, William Savitt, Sabastian V. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
As my April 30, 2009 article "Holocaust-Era Art Restitution Revisited" stated, Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
Prosecutors contended that Mrs. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:29 pm
A post that Mr. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 2:40 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
The case, Lawson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
Thanks to last year’s decision in Connick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
’” Id. at *4 (quoting Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d at 1074; quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 1:32 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:24 am
Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:31 pm
Stein enlisted the help of the State's district attorneys, including Mr. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
(quoting Wainwright v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm
” In Landgraf v. [read post]